EGG is now evaluating sites across whole Sweden. Back to homepage

We don't wait for buildings to find us.
We find them first.

Traditional development starts when a landowner calls. EGG starts earlier — evaluating every industrial building's potential before the conversation begins, then reaching out to the owners worth talking to.

Limited resources go to the wrong places.

Municipalities, private developers, and individual investors spend significant capital trying to identify which industrial buildings are worth renovating. The process is long, expensive, and almost entirely manual.

Without data, they choose blindly. A building is selected. Studies are commissioned. Twelve to eighteen months and hundreds of thousands of euros later, they discover it isn't viable — or that a far better site was overlooked entirely.

Those resources didn't disappear. They were simply never available for what actually matters: the renovation itself.

The platform exists to make sure the right building is identified before resources are spent — not after.
Without the platform
12 months · €380k
Invested in due diligence. Conversion not viable.
With the platform
This was the one.
High-potential from day one.
Industry building
Current city boundary
Future growth zone
Historical city center

What identifying the right building actually means.

62,000
Addressable homes
Homes that already exist inside Sweden's industrial buildings — waiting to be identified and built.
4°C
Urban heat penalty
Every large idle industrial site raises local ambient temperature by up to 4°C compared to residential use.
−65%
Carbon advantage
Industrial reuse emits 65% less embodied carbon than an equivalent new-build residential project.
14 mo → min
Evaluation speed
Traditional feasibility studies take 12–18 months. The platform returns a scored verdict in minutes.

How precise is the platform?

The Precision Index measures how much of a building's true conversion potential our platform can detect. It is a weighted composite of six evaluation dimensions.

We are transparent about where we stand today — and where we expect to go.

Lindholmen Works, Gothenburg — 48 homes inside a shipyard.

A 4,200 m² riveted-steel hall, empty since 2018. The platform identified it as a Scenario 02 site — partial preservation with loft insertion — returning the best risk-adjusted yield across all three scenarios evaluated.

Scenario 01
Full gut & rebuild
Units62
Cost index1.00
ROI11.2%
Scenario 02 · Recommended
Partial preserve, loft
Units48
Cost index0.68
ROI18.4%
Scenario 03
Shell only, minimal
Units32
Cost index0.42
ROI14.6%

Want to see the full methodology?

Request platform access to browse every evaluated site and download the full paper.

Back to homepage